reports:report_66
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |||
reports:report_66 [2021/02/23 15:30] – ↷ Page moved and renamed from unapprovedreports:sss_lll to reports:report_66 luisa | reports:report_66 [2021/04/15 21:29] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== | + | ====== |
=== From World Housing Encyclopedia === | === From World Housing Encyclopedia === | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 6: | Line 8: | ||
==== 1. General Information ==== | ==== 1. General Information ==== | ||
- | **Report:** | + | **Report |
+ | |||
+ | **Building Type:** Precast reinforced concrete frame panel system of seria IIS-04 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Country: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Author(s): | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Last Updated:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Regions Where Found:** Buildings of this construction type can be found in Tashkent and other cities of Uzbekistan and Central Asia. In Tashkent, this housing type accounts for over 18% of the residential building stock and for over 25% of the public building stock. This type of housing construction is commonly found in urban areas. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Summary: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Length of time practiced: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Still Practiced: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **In practice as of:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Building Occupancy: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical number of stories:** 9-12 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Terrain-Flat: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Terrain-Sloped: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Comments: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 2. Features ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Plan Shape:** Rectangular, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on plan shape:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical plan length (meters):** 24 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical plan width (meters):** 15 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical story height (meters):** 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Structural System:** Structural Concrete: Precast Concrete: Moment frame | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on structural system:** The vertical load-resisting system is reinforced concrete moment resisting frame. The gravity load-bearing structure consists of reinforced concrete frame, including precast columns and beams and precast floor panels. The lateral load-resisting system is reinforced concrete moment resisting frame. The lateral load-resisting system is reinforced concrete frame, which consists of precast columns and beams and cast in-situ or precast concrete shear walls. Precast frame elements are joined together in the space frame structure. Shear walls may be made of precast panels or cast in-situ elevator cores in the taller buildings of this type (e.g., 12-story buildings). In medium-rise buildings of this type (e.g., 4-5 stories), the entire lateral load-resisting system consists of a RC frame only (i.e., shear walls are not present). Precast floor panels are joined in a rigid diaphragm for the distribution of lateral forces. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical wall densities in direction 1:** 4-5% | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical wall densities in direction 2:** 4-5% | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on typical wall densities: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Wall Openings:** Usually a rectangular plan. In this housing type, the main load-bearing elements are the columns, beams and joints (a frame structure). Therefore, seismic vulnerability does not depend on the number and size of the openings. The size of the windows and doors ranges from 2.25 m to 4.5 m. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings?: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Modifications of buildings: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Foundation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on foundation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Floor System:** Other floor system | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on floor system:** Structural concrete: Hollow core slab (precast) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Roof System:** Roof system, other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on roof system:** Structural concrete: Hollow core slab (precast) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments section 2:** When separated from adjacent buildings, the typical distance from a neighboring building is 30 meters. Typical Plan Dimensions: Typical plan dimensions: 18x18m, 12x36m, 15x24m Typical Span: The typical span may be either 6 or 3 meters. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 3. Building Process ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Description of Building Materials=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Structural Element ^ Building Material (s) ^ Comment (s) ^ | ||
+ | | Wall/Frame | Partition Walls: Reinforced concrete Wall panels (vertical diaphragms): | ||
+ | | Foundations | Reinforced concrete | 10-15 MPa (cube compressive strength) Mix- 1: 1,4: 2: 0,49 Dimensions: 1400 X 1400 X 900 (mm) | | ||
+ | | Floors | Reinforced concrete | 30 MPa (cube compressive strength) Mix- 1: 1.75: 3.24: 0.44 Dimensions : 6000 X 220 X 1600 (mm) | | ||
+ | | Roof | Reinforced concrete | 30 MPa (cube compressive strength) Mix- 1: 1.75: 3.24: 0.44 Dimensions : 6000 X 220 X 1600 (mm) | | ||
+ | | Other | Column: Reinforced concrete Girder: Reinforced concrete | Column: 40 MPa (cube compressive strength) Girder: 40 MPa (cube compressive strength) Column: 1: 2: 3: 0.5 Cross sectional dimensions: 400 X 400 (mm) X height (3300 -13500 mm) Girder: Mix- 1: 1.4: 2.8: 0.49 Cross-sectional dimensions: 420 X 480 (mm) | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Design Process === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who is involved with the design process?** EngineerArchitectOther | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Roles of those involved in the design process:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Expertise of those involved in the design process:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Construction Process === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who typically builds this construction type?** OwnerBuilderOther | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Roles of those involved in the building process:** A builder may live in this construction type, and his children may attend the schools housed in buildings of this type. Typically, frame panel buildings are constructed by order of the municipality. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Expertise of those involved in building process:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Construction process and phasing:** Based on the order of the government, a design agency develops a series of industrialized construction elements. Based on the information provided by the design agency, a concrete plant prepares a set of metal forms for the columns, girders, diaphragms, slabs, wall panels, staircases, etc., corresponding to the requirements of a series. Based on the order of a municipality or other clients, design firms develop designs of individual buildings or typical (standardized) building designs. A concrete plant manufactures and delivers all required building elements to the construction site. A construction company erects the building at the construction site. The main pieces of equipment used for the construction are a tower crane, welding equipment, and concrete mixers. The construction of this type of housing takes place in a single phase. Typically, the building is originally designed for its final constructed size. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Construction issues:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Codes and Standards=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this construction type address by codes/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Applicable codes or standards: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Process for building code enforcement: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Permits and Development Control Rules === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Are building permits required?** Yes | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this typically informal construction? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules?** Yes | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Building Maintenance and Condition === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical problems associated with this type of construction: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who typically maintains buildings of this type?** Owner(s)Renter(s) | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on maintenance and building condition: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Construction Economics === | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Unit construction cost:** 33000 sum/m# (110 US$/m#). | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Labor requirements: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments section 3:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 4. Socio-Economic Issues ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Patterns of occupancy: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the day:** >20 | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the evening/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on number of inhabitants: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Economic level of inhabitants: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on economic level of inhabitants: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Typical Source of Financing: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on financing: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Type of Ownership: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on ownership: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available?: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **What does earthquake insurance typically cover/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Are premium discounts or higher coverages available for seismically strengthened buildings or new buildings built to incorporate seismically resistant features?: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on premium discounts: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments section 4:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 5. Earthquakes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Year ^ Earthquake Epicenter ^ Richter Magnitude | ||
+ | | 1984 | Gazli | 7.2 | IX (MSK) | | ||
+ | | 1988 | Spitak (Armenia) | 7.5 | IX-X (MSK) | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Past Earthquakes === | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance === | ||
+ | |||
+ | The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 “Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard”, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^Structural/ | ||
+ | | Lateral load path | The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Building Configuration-Vertical | The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Building Configuration-Horizontal | The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Roof Construction | The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Floor Construction | The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Foundation Performance | There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy | The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Wall Proportions | Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls); | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Foundation-Wall Connection | Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; | ||
+ | | Wall-Roof Connections | Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Wall Openings | | TRUE | | ||
+ | | Quality of Building Materials | Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Quality of Workmanship | Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards). | FALSE | | ||
+ | | Maintenance | Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber). | FALSE | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on structural and architectural features for seismic resistance: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type:** Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type:** Other | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in walls:** Exterior and interior partition walls are non-load-bearing (i.e., they carry their own weight only). | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Earthquake-resilient features in walls:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in frames:** The most vulnerable parts of a frame are beam-column joints; these welded joints are located in the area of extremely high loads. As a result of the welding, steel reinforcement bars may have loose ductility. Also, the concrete poured in these joints is often poorly vibrated. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Earthquake-resilient features in frame:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in roof and floors:** The joints between the precast slabs (grouted in-situ) are sometimes not properly filled with grout and may lose their strength in an earthquake. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Earthquake resilient features in roof and floors:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Seismic deficiency in foundation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Earthquake-resilient features in foundation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Seismic Vulnerability Rating === | ||
+ | |||
+ | For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | | | ||
+ | | | A | B | C | D | E | F | | ||
+ | | Seismic vulnerability class | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments section 5:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 6. Retrofit Information ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{gallery>: | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Structural Deficiency ^ Seismic Strengthening ^ | ||
+ | | Beam-column joints | Reinforcing of joints with steel plates | | ||
+ | | Frame (column) | Installation of additional (external) steel ties (straps) | | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages?** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Who performed the construction: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes? | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Additional comments section 6:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== 7. References ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 1. Construction in Earthquake-prone Areas National Building Code of Uzbekistan, KMK 2.01.03-96 1996 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 2. Concrete and Reinforced Concrete - Design Codes and Standards | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 3. Construction Catalog: seria IIS-04.16 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 4. Earthquakes and Us Klyachko, | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Authors === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Name ^ Title ^ Affiliation ^ Location ^ Email ^ | ||
+ | | Shamil Khakimov | Shamil Khakimov Head of the Department, | Institute of Typical and Experimental Design | Experimental Design | | | ||
+ | | Bakhtiar Nurtaev | Deputy Director | Institute of Geology and Geophysics | Khodjibaeva 49, Tashkent 700041, UZBEKISTAN | Nurtaev@ingeo.uz | | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Reviewers === | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Name ^ Title ^ Affiliation ^ Location ^ Email ^ | ||
+ | | Svetlana N. Brzev | Instructor | Civil and Structural Engineering Technology, British Columbia Institute of Technology | Burnaby BC V5G 3H2, CANADA | sbrzev@bcit.ca | | ||
- | **Building Type:** sss |
reports/report_66.1614094225.txt.gz · Last modified: 2021/04/15 21:29 (external edit)