User Tools

Site Tools


reports:report_204

Reinforced Masonry (Series 1A-450), Armenia

From World Housing Encyclopedia


1. General Information

Report: 204

Building Type: Reinforced Masonry (Series 1A-450)

Country: Armenia

Author(s):

Last Updated:

Regions Where Found: This building typology can be found in all major in Armenia. Roughly estimated, around 15% of the multi-apartment building stock of the country consist of this typology.

Summary: Stone buildings, mydis type wall. Thickness is 50cm with cement mortat, Precast concrete void slab. Seismic pands are provided around the floor slabs. Vertical reinforcement of RC members were provided for the walls. Multi-apartment buildings with 4-5 storeys, constructed at the beginning of the 1970s until 1988.

Length of time practiced: 25-60 years

Still Practiced: Off

In practice as of:

Building Occupancy: Residential, 20-49 unitsResidential, 50+ units

Typical number of stories: Off

Terrain-Flat: Off

Terrain-Sloped: 4-5

Comments: Construction type typically on both flat and sloped (hilly) terrains.


2. Features

Plan Shape: Rectangular, solid

Additional comments on plan shape: 11

Typical plan length (meters): 2.7

Typical plan width (meters): 35-50

Typical story height (meters):

Type of Structural System: Masonry: Reinforced Masonry: Stone masonry in cement mortarMasonry: Reinforced Masonry: Concrete block masonry in cement mortar

Additional comments on structural system: >20%

Gravity load-bearing & lateral load-resisting systems: The typical wall density usually exceeds 20% (total wall area / plan area). Usually, this type of construction does not have common walls with adjacent buildings.

Typical wall densities in direction 1:

Typical wall densities in direction 2: >20%

Additional comments on typical wall densities:

Wall Openings:

Is it typical for buildings of this type to have common walls with adjacent buildings? Off

Modifications of buildings:

Type of Foundation: Other Foundation

Additional comments on foundation: Belt foundation

Type of Floor System: Cast-in-place beamless reinforced concrete floorPrecast concrete floor with reinforced concrete topping

Additional comments on floor system:

Type of Roof System Cast-in-place beamless reinforced concrete roofPrecast concrete roof with reinforced concrete toppingRoof system, other

Additional comments on roof system:

Additional comments section 2:

Infill wall material:


3. Buildings Process

Description of Building Materials

Structural Element Building Material (s) Comment (s)
Wall/Frame
Foundations
Floors
Roof
Other

Design Process

Who is involved with the design process? Engineers are involved in the design process.

Roles of those involved in the design process: Engineer

Expertise of those involved in the design:


Construction Process

Who typically builds this construction type?: Builder

Roles of those involved in the building process:

Expertise of those involved in building process: The construction is carried out by builders. Code Provisions had been followed in the construction process.

Construction process and phasing:

Construction issues: Off


Building Codes and Standards

Is this construction type address by codes/standards? The current standard is the Seismic Code of the Republic of Armenia CHPA II-2.02-94, which includes updates on SNIP 62, used for construction in all former Soviet Union countries.

Applicable codes or standards:

Process for building code enforcement:


Building Permits and Development Control Rules

Are building permits required? Off

Is this typically informal construction? No

Is this construction typically authorized as per development control rules? Off

Additional comments on building permits and development control rules:


Building Maintenance and Condition

Typical problems associated with this type of construction: Construction is typically formal (with permits, plans, etc.) and authorized as per development control rules.

Who typically maintains buildings of this type? Owner(s)

Additional comments on maintenance and building condition:


Construction Economics

Unit construction cost: The owner, if interested, is the one who maintains the building.

Labor requirements:

Additional comments section 3:


4. Socio-Economic Issues

Patterns of occupancy: >20

Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the day:

Number of inhabitants in a typical building of this construction type during the evening/night:

Additional comments on number of inhabitants: >20

Economic level of inhabitants: Very low-income class (very poor)Low-income class (poor)Middle-income class

Additional comments on economic level of inhabitants: Other

Typical Source of Financing:

Additional comments on financing: Other

Type of Ownership: Off

Additional comments on ownership

Is earthquake insurance for this construction type typically available?

What does earthquake insurance typically cover/cost:

Are premium discounts or higher coverages available for seismically strengthened buildings or new buildings built to incorporate seismically resistant features? Off

Additional comments on premium discounts:

Additional comments section 4:


5. Earthquakes

Past Earthquakes in the country which affected buildings of this type

Year Earthquake Epicenter Richter Magnitude Maximum Intensity
1988 Spitak, Armenia Mw 6.9

Past Earthquakes

Damage patterns observed in past earthquakes for this construction type:

Additional comments on earthquake damage patterns:


The main reference publication used in developing the statements used in this table is FEMA 310 “Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings-A Pre-standard”, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., 1998.

The total width of door and window openings in a wall is: For brick masonry construction in cement mortar : less than ½ of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For adobe masonry, stone masonry and brick masonry in mud mortar: less than 1/3 of the distance between the adjacent cross walls; For precast concrete wall structures: less than 3/4 of the length of a perimeter wall.

Structural and Architectural Features for Seismic Resistance

Structural/Architectural Feature Statement Seismic Resistance
Lateral load path The structure contains a complete load path for seismic force effects from any horizontal direction that serves to transfer inertial forces from the building to the foundation. N/A
Building Configuration-Vertical The building is regular with regards to the elevation. (Specify in 5.4.1) N/A
Building Configuration-Horizontal The building is regular with regards to the plan. (Specify in 5.4.2) N/A
Roof Construction The roof diaphragm is considered to be rigid and it is expected that the roof structure will maintain its integrity, i.e. shape and form, during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. N/A
Floor Construction The floor diaphragm(s) are considered to be rigid and it is expected that the floor structure(s) will maintain its integrity during an earthquake of intensity expected in this area. N/A
Foundation Performance There is no evidence of excessive foundation movement (e.g. settlement) that would affect the integrity or performance of the structure in an earthquake. N/A
Wall and Frame Structures-Redundancy The number of lines of walls or frames in each principal direction is greater than or equal to 2. N/A
Wall Proportions Height-to-thickness ratio of the shear walls at each floor level is: Less than 25 (concrete walls); Less than 30 (reinforced masonry walls); Less than 13 (unreinforced masonry walls); N/A
Foundation-Wall Connection Vertical load-bearing elements (columns, walls) are attached to the foundations; concrete columns and walls are doweled into the foundation. N/A
Wall-Roof Connections Exterior walls are anchored for out-of-plane seismic effects at each diaphragm level with metal anchors or straps. N/A
Wall Openings N/A
Quality of Building Materials Quality of building materials is considered to be adequate per the requirements of national codes and standards (an estimate). N/A
Quality of Workmanship Quality of workmanship (based on visual inspection of a few typical buildings) is considered to be good (per local construction standards). N/A
Maintenance Buildings of this type are generally well maintained and there are no visible signs of deterioration of building elements (concrete, steel, timber). N/A

Additional comments on structural and architectural features for seismic resistance:

Vertical irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Horizontal irregularities typically found in this construction type: Other

Seismic deficiency in walls:

Earthquake-resilient features in walls:

Seismic deficiency in frames:

Earthquake-resilient features in frame:

Seismic deficiency in roof and floors:

Earthquake resilient features in roof and floors:

Seismic deficiency in foundation:

Earthquake-resilient features in foundation:


Seismic Vulnerability Rating

For information about how seismic vulnerability ratings were selected see the Seismic Vulnerability Guidelines

High vulnerabilty Medium vulnerability Low vulnerability
A B C D E F
Seismic vulnerability class o

Additonal comments on vulnerability rating:


6. Retrofit Information

Description of Seismic Strengthening Provisions


Structural Deficiency Seismic Strengthening

Additional comments on seismic strengthening provisions:

Has seismic strengthening described in the above table been performed?:

Was the work done as a mitigation effort on an undamaged building or as a repair following earthquake damages?:

Was the construction inspected in the same manner as new construction?:

Who performed the construction: a contractor or owner/user? Was an architect or engineer involved?:

What has been the performance of retrofitted buildings of this type in subsequent earthquakes?:

Additional comments section 6:


7. References

Authors

Name Title Affiliation Location Email

Reviewers

Name Title Affiliation Location Email
reports/report_204.txt · Last modified: 2021/04/15 21:29 by 127.0.0.1

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki